[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.They aredutiful and eat their vegetables.They are born pure and need to be protected fromthe sinful adult world.Kids, on the other hand, are junior anarchists! They make alot of noise, don t ever sit still, and play tricks with grownups as their victims.Kidhood (as opposed to childhood) is a wild and free time, and kids have license todo what they want until responsibility comes along. Brian M.Young, Issues andPolitics of Televisual Advertising and Children, in Palmer and Young, The Facesof Televisual Media, 327 46 at 333.Palmer similarly notes, Whereas children areperceived as potential victims of advertising and marketing, who therefore needprotection, kids are perceived as streetwise, savvy, and quite ready for the ad-filledmarketplace. Edward L.Palmer, Realities and Challenges in the Rapidly ChangingTelevisual Media Landscape, in Palmer and Young, The Faces of Televisual Media,361 77 at 375.52.Kay S.Hymowitz, The Contradictions of Parenting in a Media Age, in KidStuff: Marketing Sex and Violence to America s Children, ed.Diane Ravitch and Joseph P.Viteritti (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 228.53.James U.McNeal, Kids as Customers: A Handbook of Marketing to Children(New York: Lexington Books, 1992); italics in text. 78 Chapter 254.Cited in Sabita Majib Watch Out. The Hindu Business Line, June 10, 2005,www.thehindubusinessline.com (accessed June 11, 2005).55.Susan Linn, Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of Childhood (New York:The New Press, 2004), 150 51.56.Keenan and Fuller, The International AIDS Conference in Bangkok, 13 16;and The Language of Human Rights and Social Justice in the Face of HIV/AIDS, 211 31 at 213.57.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 144.58.Indira A.R.Lakshmanan, In Danger s Way: Trapped in Cycles of Poverty,Children Toil in Bolivia s Mines, Boston Globe, June 26, 2005, A1, A10.59.Information on Focus on the Family can be found at www.family.org (accessedMay 16, 2009).60.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 144.61.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 145.62.Christine E.Gudorf, Western Religion and the Patriarchal Family, in Curran,Farley, and McCormick, Feminist Ethics and the Catholic Moral Tradition, 251 77.63.See Arlie Russell Hochschild, The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home andHome Becomes Work (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1997); and with Anne Mac-hung, The Second Shift (New York: Avon Books, 1990).64.For an account of the need for greater gender justice within the family settingsee Susan Moller Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).For an integration of the need for justice within families and the need for the virtueof care in wider social networks see Mary Stewart van Leeuwen, Annelies Knoppers,Margaret L.Koch, Douglas J.Schuurman, and Helen M.Sterk, After Eden: Facing theChallenge of Gender Reconciliation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993), 416 51.65.Gudorf, Western Religion, 266.66.Thomas Massaro, Catholic Social Teaching and United States Welfare Reform(Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1998), 71 77.67.Gudorf, Western Religion, 267.While this may be true, it may also play intothe debates about quality time with children over quantity. Parents with accessto adequate, even superior, child care are freed to be with children for play and emo-tional satisfaction without having to be the primary disciplinarians or educators.68.It should be noted that the principle of subsidiarity in the Catholic tradition,which provides protection for families from interference on the part of the state, alsoallows such interference when individual members of the family are threatened.Sub-sidiarity highlights both the autonomy and interdependence of social institutions likethe family, the church, national governments, and international bodies.69.There is an important caveat here.Poor families, often headed by womenwithout the active presence of a husband or father, are not encouraged to live up tothis ideal in the same way that middle class families are.For families with access toresources, the presence of the mother as primary nurturer is crucial for children supbringing.Fathers are encouraged to be responsible and faithful wage earners andmothers are called to return from professional work to the home.Poor women whoreceive public assistance are required to do just the opposite [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
zanotowane.pl doc.pisz.pl pdf.pisz.pl milosnikstop.keep.pl
.They aredutiful and eat their vegetables.They are born pure and need to be protected fromthe sinful adult world.Kids, on the other hand, are junior anarchists! They make alot of noise, don t ever sit still, and play tricks with grownups as their victims.Kidhood (as opposed to childhood) is a wild and free time, and kids have license todo what they want until responsibility comes along. Brian M.Young, Issues andPolitics of Televisual Advertising and Children, in Palmer and Young, The Facesof Televisual Media, 327 46 at 333.Palmer similarly notes, Whereas children areperceived as potential victims of advertising and marketing, who therefore needprotection, kids are perceived as streetwise, savvy, and quite ready for the ad-filledmarketplace. Edward L.Palmer, Realities and Challenges in the Rapidly ChangingTelevisual Media Landscape, in Palmer and Young, The Faces of Televisual Media,361 77 at 375.52.Kay S.Hymowitz, The Contradictions of Parenting in a Media Age, in KidStuff: Marketing Sex and Violence to America s Children, ed.Diane Ravitch and Joseph P.Viteritti (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 228.53.James U.McNeal, Kids as Customers: A Handbook of Marketing to Children(New York: Lexington Books, 1992); italics in text. 78 Chapter 254.Cited in Sabita Majib Watch Out. The Hindu Business Line, June 10, 2005,www.thehindubusinessline.com (accessed June 11, 2005).55.Susan Linn, Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of Childhood (New York:The New Press, 2004), 150 51.56.Keenan and Fuller, The International AIDS Conference in Bangkok, 13 16;and The Language of Human Rights and Social Justice in the Face of HIV/AIDS, 211 31 at 213.57.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 144.58.Indira A.R.Lakshmanan, In Danger s Way: Trapped in Cycles of Poverty,Children Toil in Bolivia s Mines, Boston Globe, June 26, 2005, A1, A10.59.Information on Focus on the Family can be found at www.family.org (accessedMay 16, 2009).60.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 144.61.Gudorf, Rights of Children, 145.62.Christine E.Gudorf, Western Religion and the Patriarchal Family, in Curran,Farley, and McCormick, Feminist Ethics and the Catholic Moral Tradition, 251 77.63.See Arlie Russell Hochschild, The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home andHome Becomes Work (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1997); and with Anne Mac-hung, The Second Shift (New York: Avon Books, 1990).64.For an account of the need for greater gender justice within the family settingsee Susan Moller Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).For an integration of the need for justice within families and the need for the virtueof care in wider social networks see Mary Stewart van Leeuwen, Annelies Knoppers,Margaret L.Koch, Douglas J.Schuurman, and Helen M.Sterk, After Eden: Facing theChallenge of Gender Reconciliation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993), 416 51.65.Gudorf, Western Religion, 266.66.Thomas Massaro, Catholic Social Teaching and United States Welfare Reform(Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1998), 71 77.67.Gudorf, Western Religion, 267.While this may be true, it may also play intothe debates about quality time with children over quantity. Parents with accessto adequate, even superior, child care are freed to be with children for play and emo-tional satisfaction without having to be the primary disciplinarians or educators.68.It should be noted that the principle of subsidiarity in the Catholic tradition,which provides protection for families from interference on the part of the state, alsoallows such interference when individual members of the family are threatened.Sub-sidiarity highlights both the autonomy and interdependence of social institutions likethe family, the church, national governments, and international bodies.69.There is an important caveat here.Poor families, often headed by womenwithout the active presence of a husband or father, are not encouraged to live up tothis ideal in the same way that middle class families are.For families with access toresources, the presence of the mother as primary nurturer is crucial for children supbringing.Fathers are encouraged to be responsible and faithful wage earners andmothers are called to return from professional work to the home.Poor women whoreceive public assistance are required to do just the opposite [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]